Law Philosophers Assignment

Philosophers Assignment Aristotle was born in 384 B. C. E until 322 B. C. E. He was a Greek philosopher who lived in Stagira in north Greece. He was the boy of Nichomachus, Aristotle analyze medicine and then in 367 BCE he was then sent to capital of Greece to study philosophy. He has stayed and studied at Platos academy until 347 BCE, he had a different idea then Plato. Aristotle believed The on the dot thitherfore means that which is constabularyful and that which is play off or fair(Morris, 1981) When Plato had died Aristotle was not the designate of Platos Academy.Aristotle left Athens he went travelling maybe studying in Turkey, which used to be called Asia Minor. In 338 he returned back to Macedonian and had tutored Alexander the Great, afterwards(prenominal) Alexander the Great had taken everyplace Athens, Aristotle had returned to Athens to setup his own drill called Lyceum. After Alexander the Great passed absent Athens attacked Macedonian and Aristotle political berth became risky. He fled away and went to Eubroea where he has by and by passed away in 322 B. C. E. Aristotle believed in democratic hunting lodge were he believed that everyone should shargon jibely.He believed that if tribe be unequal they may be allotted unequal shares (Morris 1981). Thomas doubting Thomas was born in Lombardy, Italy in 1225 and later passed away in 1274 he lived only if 49 years. He was born in his familys castle in the region of Naples, he had eight siblings and he was the youngest of them all. At the age of five he had been emaciated into a school at Montecassino. He was later transferred to University of Naples. He came into contact with Aristotle, and became a Domini privy all over the disputes of his family and then he headed north to study.Briefly in Paris, and then he went onto a different school called eau de cologne were he was with Albert the Great, he later studied technology at the University of Paris he became an expert in philosophy a nd in separate works of Aristotle. He believed that truth is chiefly ordained to the common unattackable and intention of practice of justnessmaker should be to intimation gentlemans gentleman to virtue (Our Legal Heritage, 92) He did not assume that natural uprightness makes muckle vertical, just rather that man obeys a law due to him beingness easily(Philosophers of Law, Note) Noam Chomsky is born on December 7th, 928 in Philadelphia he was Jewish born philosopher who had bring in his PhD in linguals at the University of Pennsylvania. Since 1955 he was a professor at MlT and had do great theories on human linguistic ability. Chomsky had a little brother named David his family was a middle class family. Noam Chomsky grew up ceremony officers beat women in front of a textile pile. His mother Elise Chomsky was an active grouping politic in the 1930s his suffer William Chomsky who was a Russian Jewish Immigrant. Chomsky at the age of ten years honest-to-god had wr itten a newspaper newspaper column on the rise of fascism in Europe.He believes that law primarily serves those in power. Cooperation between the lively class and of citizens and lawmakers to make laws that maintain the courtly and wealth and power of the lively. Aristotle would evaluate Canadian Law is he would bid how we prepare the Canadian acquire of Rights and Freedoms he would like section 15 millsection (1) in the choose which is Equality Rights every single(a) is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal arrive at of the law Constitution Act, 1982).This tot ups with Aristotle because he too said that everyone is equal and should be case- solidened the same. Also he would train on section 7 of the Charter Legal Rights Everyone has the right to life, liberty and certification(Constitution Act, 1982). Aristotle would agree with this because it shows that everyone has the equal rights for life and humanity. He would agree that taxing the wealthy would be good because it lessens the chance of them overruling.He believes that everyone should be treated equally, so in Canadian law the same cases cant be treated the same way as other. He would believe that Canadian law would be a problem because he wants everyone to be treated the same. He would likewise differ with welfare because it takes away our property that we earned by working hard for. He would also have a problem with one regulation run lowting elected because of false information being used to be a dominion of a country. Aristotle would believe that our laws our good and it could be bad at the same time.Thomas doubting Thomas would believe that the Canadian law would correct or expand on his theories of people. In section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms the rights and freedoms set out in it cogitation only to such reasonable limits incontrovertible by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic societ y(Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982). He would agree with this because it shows that man can be free just now it is up to them if they want to obey the law.It is fundamentally stating Aquinas scheme that man obeys a law due to him being good it is a guideline to say you are free but remember there are laws if you do something wrong. He would differ with Canadas legal system because he was a big believer in his faith, which was Christianity he would agree much on the ten commandments because they show one ruler and they say that you cant do this or that so they are laws that over rule men. Which didnt agree with his theory that men obey law and law doesnt obey men.Noam Chomsky would evaluate Canadian Law as positive and controvert thing because it shows that media is controlled by the governance and also by the wealthy. Noam Chomsky believed that media only benefits the elite class. He believes that the rich should get richer and the poor get poorer. Under section 15 sub section 1 equal benefit of the law without discrimination basically Noam Chomsky would agree with this because it shows that everyone should be treated the same but dont discriminate if you are poor or rich.Chomsky believes that the media only benefits with the elite class but in Canadian Law he might disagree freedom of row because the media is controlled by the rich and whatever the rich say goes it could be false information, but with freedom of speech you can go to people and outspread the word. Everyone has the right to speak and also he might disagree with the Canadian government for spending money funding Iraq and other countries. Noam Chomsky a 20th and 21st nose candy philosopher he is still alive so he can compare the dissimilitude between his theories and the Canadian Law.Citations Blair, A. , Ryan Elliott, K. , Manning, B. , & Mossuto, M. (2004). Canadian and international law. Canada Oxford University Press. McGilvray James, A. (1994). Noam chomsky . Retriev ed from http//www. biography. com/people/noam-chomsky-37616 McInerny, R. (Sept, 2009 30). Metaphysics research lab, csli, stanford university. Retrieved from http//plato. stanford. edu/entries/doubting Thomas/ Waggone , B. (2000, June 09). University of california museum of paleontology. Retrieved from http//www. ucmp. berkeley. edu/history/aristotle. html