Analysis of Myth of Total Cinema: Bazin

The Myth of Total movie Andre Bazin in his article, The Myth of Total Cinema, asserts that motivation behind cinema is veryism. He explains his surmise by examining the engineering of cinema. He argues that cinema was not born from the engine room advance just now rather from innate desire to reproduce the world of our world. The basic technical discoveries be fortunate accidents essentially second in brilliance to the preconceived ideas of the inventors (Bazin, 200). What Bazin means is that the invention of engineering was not to gain bread rather to replicate and reproduce our real world on screen.Though he does argue that some were in it for the profit of the technology. Inventors of photography and cinema thinking about what they will show and reproduce primarily to how they will happen upon the reality of the world. In another words, the essential drive to reproduce the real led to the intersection of technology. The desire for realism did not come from the produc tion of technology. Bazin goes on to explain that our understanding of cinema should not derive from the technology but from the reality that is perceived through the reproduction.Related article Odeon Cinema PestleBazin goes on to state that The guiding myth, then, inspiring the invention of cinema, is the accomplishment of that which dominated in a more or less vague bearing all the techniques of the mechanical reproduction of reality in the nineteenth century, from photography to phonograph, namely an integral realism, a recreation of the world in its proclaim image, an image unburdened by the freedom of interpretation of the artist or the irreversibility of time (Bazin, 202). What he is trying to elucidate is that the guiding myth of realism and cinema should be the production of cinema unburdened by an artists interpretation or subjectivity.It also means that the time is not restricted. In addition Bazin continues, The real primitives of the cinema, existing only in the imag inations of a few men of the nineteenth century, are in complete burlesque of nature (Bazin, 202). He is stating that a real cinema is established by those who dream of cinema as a replicate of nature. Bazin concludes that the myth of summarise cinema is realism, and that it has been a part of every man in the beginning invention of technology. Bazins article is very interesting and reasonable but his arguments only justify one side of the story.Cinema is not only a tool for reproduction of nature but also an apparatus for trick and dreams. It can be argued, I too agree, that the development of technology was created for the consumption of recreating nature, but the development of technology has advanced artistically. This artistic development of technology has aided many in creating their imagination that are beyond reality. For example, the film, Inception, contains scenes that are impossible to film in reality. Scenes containing upside buildings, never ending stairs, building s crumbling and and so forth are very difficult to accomplish without the help of the advancing technology. stock-still the advancing technology has made it possible to create the impossible. What I am trying to say is that the story of Inception was not created prior to the advancement of technology but after. The story of the film was thought out with the possibilities of the technology in mind. Bazin maybe correct in stating that cinema was essentially the raw(a) drive of human desire to reconstruct and imitate reality though we can argue that it is not the only drive of cinema.