Afterimages and Token Identity Theory Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

After run acrosss and Token Identity Theory - Essay ExampleI have further stared at a bright neon light bulb shaped like a dismay for exactly one minute. When I close my eye, I evict externalize an after mountain range of the cow, but it is ever-changing colors and the shape is shifting somewhat. After a while, the image disappears entirely.To answer this question, there seems to be 3 logical positions for explaining what I see. First, there is the assertion that the afterimage doesnt exist at all. This position makes a authentic amount of sense to me, because I understand that beholding requires the use of my eyes and that my eyes respond to light. If my eyes are closed, there is no light hitting them and I shouldnt be able-bodied see anything. This pot is problematic for me, however, because I fag still see the image before me. It may be changing colors and the shape may be shifting, but I can perceive it very clearly. If the image did not exist at all, then I wouldnt b e able to see it. Therefore, since I can see it, it has to exist somewhere. The second position is that the afterimage exists, but it isnt natural. I can accept this thought process more easily than the first because it allows me to believe in the reality of what I see without having to prove that it exists in a physical sense. This view is also problematic, however, because it challenges my rationality I am seeing the image when I shouldnt be able to. I can describe the changes in color and shape. Even though the image eventually goes away, I jazz that I continued to see it after I closed my eyes. I dont have a good explanation for why I can see it, however, because I know that it isnt physically possible for me to see it. To adopt this position, I have to explain why I can see something that is no longer there and that isnt very logical. The third and final explanation for the afterimage is that it exists and that it is physical. On its face, this position gives me the most opti ons for believing in the image that I see because I can pass judgment its reality to a physical process. Even though I may not be able to explain exactly what is happening, this position allows me to assert that the image is real and that there is a rational physical or biological solid ground for it. Unfortunately, this position has its own difficulty with my understanding of vision. Even though I can describe the afterimage in terms of its shapes and colors, to assert that there is a physical reason violates what I know about the biological process of vision. I see with my eyes because light stimulates the steel and those nerves transmit the image to my brain. If my eyes are closed, then I shouldnt be able to see anything because there is no light coming into my brain. Once I close my eyes, the neon cow cannot be truly seen because there is no more light being processed by my visual nerves. find the answer to this question is difficult because I have to balance what my eyes ar e seeing with what I know about vision. As Seager states in his discussion of token identity theory, the essential idea is that psychogenic states are ascribed through the interpretation of behavior under the constraint of rationality (54). My mental state of seeing the colored cow and interpreting its behavior is constrained by my own rational mind.My position.I result argue for position two, the view that the afterimage exists, but it is not physical. Even though this position has problems, I think this is the best explanation for the afterimage. First, the image exists for me. I see it, so that excludes position one, but there is no real physical reason to do so which excludes