Justice in Platos Republic and Hobbes Leviathan Essay -- Politics Phi

One of the main concepts in both Platos Republic and Hobbes Leviathan is evaluator. For Plato, the object of his Republic is to release what evaluator is and to demonstrate that it is better than injustice. Plato does this by explaining justice in two contrasting ways through a urban c get into or polis and through an individual human beings soul. He uses justice in a city to reveal justice in an individual. For Hobbes, the destination justice is used to explain the relationship among morality and self-centeredness. Hobbes explains justice in relation to obligations and self-preservation. This essay leave behind analyze justice specifically in relation to the statement ? The fool hath said in his heart, there is no such(prenominal) thing as justice? Looking at Hobbes? react to the fool will demonstrate that his main goal was to declare what citizenry ought to do when interacting with others and what can be expected in return for that behaviour. By analyzing the Repub lic, it will be shown that Plato would most likely differ with the statement make by the fool because the main of premise the book in itself is to discover the definition of justice. To understand Hobbes? reply to the fool, one must first desexualise justice according to Hobbes. He believes that justice is men performing their cartels do and the constant will of giving every man his own. A covenant is a part of a contract, or ?mutual transfer aura of right, in which at least one of the parties ?is to perform in time to come?. Hobbes maintains that it is never against reason to complete a covenant when man has the security that others will in addition perform covenants made with him. However, the problem that arises from forming covenants is that just because people enter into a covenant to perform some actio... ...ing so he also showed that there is such a thing a justice within a city as well as in an individual. Thus, Plato?s reply to the fool would be that indeed there is such a thing as justice. And justice is respectable because it benefits in this life as well as the next. Therefore, even though a man whitethorn wish to behave unjustly when he can, as with the myth of the ring of Gyges, behaving justly will have the most rewards. Both Plato and Hobbes present different views of justice in reply to the fool. Plato, claiming one should be just because it is good in itself, where as Hobbes claims being just is good for the pursuit of self-interest or preservation. Despite the difference of opinion on justice between the two philosophers, it is clear that the fool?s statement has been refuted. For there is such a thing as justice despite the differences in how the term is defined.